The Nevada Legislature begins its 77th session

(posted by Bob Bennett)

As the Nevada Legislature begins its 77th session, we are reminded of Mark Twain’s remark: “No man’s life, liberty or property is safe while the Legislature is in session.”  It is definitely a body that requires watchful attention by everyone.  To make this a little easier for those who need to work for a living, don’t have paid employees to keep tabs on their interests, or are just overwhelmed by the process – we will provide a few links – and a little commentary and opinion.

List of Bill Draft Requests –

Assembly Bills  –

Senate Bills –

Bills by Topic   –

Share your opinion on bills  –

“After each war there is a little less democracy to save.”  Brooks Atkinson – (Once Around the Sun 1951)

Opinions below are mine alone, and based on a quick reading of a small portion of  proposed legislation.

Generally, bills before the legislature fall into three broad categories:

Those which transfer power from individuals to corporations.

S.B. 87 ––

Allows companies to fire employees who on their own time use medical marijuana – or any substance the employer may disapprove of.

S.J.R. 2  –  Abolishes the $1.00 an hour addition to the minimum wage for medium size businesses who do not provide health insurance.

Those which transfer power from the individual to government agencies.

S.B. 33 –  – While attempting to regulate sexual conduct by those in prisons, jails, and certain residential facilities, the plain fact of the matter is that circumstances imposed on individuals require individuals to violate section 3 a) 4 – multiple times a day.  Other provisions, such as making masturbation a felony also go way too far.

Those which transfer power from small businesses to government agencies.

S.B 96

(BDR 53-579) Imposition of fines and penalties for misclassifying employee (intentionally or not) as independent contractor – As someone who has worked as both as an independent contractor and employee  – in a gray area – certain advantages exist for each category – Although abuses do exist, most often after a small companies grows to mid –size and begin to squeeze the people doing the actual work;  this bill transfers too much power to a government agency – taking power away from both the individual contractor and employer.

Almost always these are pieces of bad legislation which need to be opposed by the people, but the people are generally ignorant of them, the mainstream media – both left and right – being more interested in kissing up to the power players than the actual welfare of the people – or the planet.

On rare occasion bills may actually propose transferring power from a government agency to individuals or from corporations to individuals.  There actually appears to be a few of these this session.    Perhaps the year of the snake will help chase the monsters of bias, shallowness and ineptitude from the kiss-up media like The Nation magazine, the RJG, Fox news – and really the entire marketing controlled press.  “You dine off the advertisers sizzle and not the meat of the steak.”  J.B Priestly, New Statesman 10 Dec 1971

Removes need to inform employer prior to filing a complaint

Revises provisions governing the restoration of civil rights for ex-felons. (BDR 16-687)

Expands prohibition on employers taking certain actions to prohibit, punish or prevent employees from engaging in politics or becoming candidates for public office with certain exceptions. (BDR 53-63)

Nationally, there has been a great hullaballoo about guns,, violence, and gun control.  Yet both the violence and the calls for restricted access to firearms is simply the result of natural law.  The left’s continued failure to recognize that a great many people believe government has become oppressive – except of course on issues regarding women and gays, has been a major stumbling block preventing major reforms from happening.  Perhaps the former cop from Los Angles who has killed three people as revenge for his being unfairly fired for reporting police abuse -and as of this writing is still on the lam, will bring about a turning point for the reactionary left.

“Government of the busy, by the bossy, for the bully.”  Arthur Sheldon; (Capitalism 1990)




The Conversation needs to Begin on what constitutes a First Rate Mental Health System.  Below is a good place to begin.  If you agree contact your elected Representatives and have them once again represent the interests of all the people.  Include your suggestions to make it better as well.


To read the full document click:  Devising Treatment protocols B

By Bob Bennett
Our current treatment protocols for those exhibiting behaviors associated with having mental health issues are inadequate, and some claim abusive. New protocols are needed where respect for the individual is integrated into the process.
In order that individuals obtain the best chance of recovery – and leading contented productive life, several changes to the system need to be implemented.
1. Screen and treat individuals for trauma (numerous non-drug modalities are available, including somatic experiencing, Eye Movement Desensitization & Reprogramming, and others.
2. Work with client to find out where he/she falls on the personality type grid utilized by the video series How To Deal With Difficult People (by Dr. Rick Brinkman & Dr. Rick Kurshner)
3. Have client attend workshops on Non-Violent Communications – (the one by Marshall Rosenberg is excellent)
4. Encourage Meditation
5. Encourage perception shifting exercises: Cellular Memory Release -see Memory in the Cells by Luis Diaz-
6. Utilize the Dali Lama’s method of transforming anger. (adapted from The Art of Happiness by the Dali Lama)
7. Investigate the use of alternative therapies including Craniosacral Therapy and sound Therapy using tuning forks. Those who receive appropriate intervention early have the best chance of optimum recovery, yet nearly all should be able to make at least some recovery.
8. Integrate the Recovery Oriented Practices by Larry Davidson, Ph.D. as recommend by SAMSHA.
1. Screen and Treat Individuals for Trauma
A history of Trauma is common in most, if not all individuals who experience emotional problems. The symptoms of trauma are quite similar to the symptoms lists of the DSM-IV – and soon to be released DSM-V. It is likely that successfully treating trauma would also substantially reduce the symptoms which are the basis for the various designations in these manuals.
Somatic Experiencing, devised by Peter Levine Ph.D. and explained in his book – Healing Trauma and Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) are two methods which have been established as effective in treating trauma. There may be others as well. EMDR was developed for children, but also highly successful with adults, this method of treating trauma doesn’t require the patient to divulge information about the trauma. While the patient recalls the incident, the eyes are guided in a smooth pattern.

To read the full document click:     Devising Treatment protocols B


atty gen002atty gen001



The Honorable Catherine Cortez Masto

Attorney General of the State of Nevada
100 North Carson Street
Carson City, NV 89701-4717

What is the responsibility of a public defender towards a criminal defendant?

Is it to assist the accused in the preparation of a defense, as stated in the U.S. Constitution (6th Amendment: In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial; by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense. ) or not?

These questions are not asked lightly and are primarily based upon personal experience from more than 20 years ago in the State of California.  Quite frankly, the process left me with disgust. The attorneys I encountered were among the rudest, most obnoxious people I had ever met.  My first arrest was due to seizures I had been experiencing which were mistaken for illegal drug use, resulting in a diagnosis of PTSD and the loss of a job at a small computer company. Following this, I did exhibit some strange behaviors which resulted in several more arrests, including a warrant issued in the wrong name as well as being lost in the system twice, among other indignities.

I do believe in acting responsible and in 1992 received Honorable Mention for a paper I wrote on how mental health courts could provide better treatment while saving communities money. I later served on Judge Breen’s committee which helped to form Nevada’s first mental health court, as well as a volunteered on several mental health related boards. However, the memories of my experiences in the courts of Los Angeles still trouble me as they have negative implications for the future of America.

Step 4 of the Dalai Lama’s method of transforming anger is to take action which will help people who find themselves in a similar position as the incidents which made you angry.  I view this letter as an action to help reduce injustice, which should result in Nevada, as well as the U.S., and the world becoming a better place to live.

While actions of individual attorneys did vary, and not all performed each of these actions, the basic performance was:

  1. Upon meeting, tell defendant: “Plead no contest and I can get you out of jail by tomorrow.”
  2. Should defendant protest innocence, tell defendant: “It doesn’t make any difference if you are guilty or not, plead no contest anyway, that’s the way the system works.”
  3. Should defendant still protest:  Display contempt towards defendant with a physical gesture.
  4. Should defendant still protest:  Inform defendant that charges will be increased, he will not receive any assistance from the attorneys, and he will spend years in prison, even if only charged with a misdemeanor.

I have also had attorneys tell me “We (the attorneys) decided that everyone charged with a crime will be found guilty of something”; “ If you were innocent, you would have been born rich enough to afford a good attorney”; “That’s all you people use as an excuse” (when attempting to obtain medication for my medical condition); as well as deliberately misleading me as to the meaning of ‘waiving time’ – lawyer short-hand for giving up the Constitutional right to a fair and speedy trial.

I came to understand, in time, that my experiences where not isolated incidents but rather the commonly accepted way of doing business in the courts of Los Angeles.  As I understand it, changes in court procedure in some counties have resulted from economizing on the cost of court due to the increased expenditures imposed by Miranda v Arizona (384 U.S. 436, 1966).   The above actions generally took place not in the court room, but in the conferences which occur prior to the proceedings which are closed to all except the attorney and defendant; except these conferences are typically crowded resulting in other defendants overhearing everything spoken.

Among the unintended consequences of Miranda are:

  1. Police no longer give suspects an opportunity to clear themselves.
  2. More suspects are arrested.
  3. Plea Bargains have largely replaced Trials.
  4. Crime is encouraged and rewarded.
  5. The innocent, and those who have mitigating circumstances regarding the charges they face, are often scapegoated.
  6. Police errors and abuse are often covered up.

The use of ‘waiving time’, lawyer shorthand for giving up the right to a fair and speedy trial, was common.  When I asked my attorney what it meant, he said it was to delay a trail for a few days so he could get ready.  A few days turned out to be 30 days, and then he just pressured me to plead ‘no contest.’ When I tried to enlist his aid in obtaining prescription medication for a condition I had since age 10 or 11, he told me “That’s what all you people use as an excuse.”  After 74 days in solitary, I caved in order not to die in jail.  The California Bar Assn. could not see anything wrong with the actions of this attorney.

The implications of Imbler v Pachtman, (424 U.S. 409, 1976) , as well as REHBERG v. PAULK No. 10–788( Argued November 1, 2011—Decided April 2, 2012) in which the U.S. Supreme Court encourages malicious prosecution is also troubling.  Perhaps the justices in the majority should be impeached for their callous disregard of the Preamble to the Constitution: We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

More about my experiences and observations regarding the criminal justice system, as practiced in Los Angeles County, can be found at The Plea Bargain System – An Evil Destroying America? .

While I have not heard of anyone in Nevada being subject to the extent of depravity under color of law, as commonly practiced in Los Angeles, many people I have spoken to believe they have been betrayed by their court appointed attorneys and unfairly manipulated into unjust plea bargains.  It is also likely that many are in Nevada prisons and jails due to the effects of trauma.  As I wait your considered response to the questions which I raise at the beginning of this letter, I hope you will take the time to read the book – Healing Trauma by Peter Levine, Ph.D. and also make your recommendations about how the courts should take the effects of trauma into consideration when certain criminal and domestic situations come before the bench.

Thank You for your attention to this matter,


Robert S. Bennett

EC:  The Commissioners of Washoe County